THE EFFECT OF COMPENSATION, WORK ENVIRONMENT AND COMPANY ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AT HALIM FERTILITY CENTER MEDAN
Main Article Content
Yori Renaldi
Bagus Handoko
Winda Ardiani
This type of research is a type of Casual Associative research, the type of causal associative research (cause and effect) is a study that aims to find out whether there is a relationship between compensation variables, work environment and organizational culture on employee job satisfaction. This research was conducted in one of the companies, namely Halim Fertility Center Medan. The population in this study was 140 employees, but the sample taken was used using the Slovin formula determination with the results of 58 employee samples using the Slovin formula sampling technique. The data source used is primary data. Researchers also collect data by distributing questionnaires as many as 20 questions using Google forms. The results of this study are that the Compensation Variable (X1) partially has a negative and insignificant effect on employee job satisfaction at the Halim Fertility Center Medan. This is known from the results of the partial test (t test) which states that the value of the t-calculation coefficient> t table, 0.925> 1.67155 at a significant 0.359 <0.05. The Work Environment Variable (X2) partially has a positive and significant effect on employee job satisfaction at the Halim Fertility Center Medan. This is known from the results of the partial test (t test) which states that the value of the t-calculation coefficient> t table, 3.190> 1.67155 at a significant 0.002 <0.05. The Organizational Culture Variable (X3) partially has a positive and significant effect on employee job satisfaction at the Halim Fertility Center Medan. This is known from the results of the partial test (t-test) which states that the coefficient value of t count> t table, 2.290> 1.67155 at a significant 0.026 <0.05. Then, the results of the study also show that the Compensation Variable (X1), Work Environment (X2), and Organizational Culture (X3) simultaneously affect Employee Job Satisfaction (Y) Halim Fertility Center Medan. (coefficient value F count> F table 67.304> 2.773 at a significant 0.000 <0.05). So the previous hypothesis (H4) is accepted. The correlation is the adjusted R Square correlation figure of 0.777 in this case meaning 77.7% of employee job satisfaction can be obtained and explained by compensation, work environment, and organizational culture. While the remaining 100% - 77.7% = 22.3% is explained by other factors or variables outside the model, such as available facilities, working conditions, communication, job security, etc.
Amirullah, 2010. Awesome Marketing Mix Strategy for Small Business, A Surefire Way to Knock Out Competitors. First Printing Jakarta: Trans Media Pustaka
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2017. Development of Research Instruments and Program Evaluation. . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Dhermawan. 2012. The Influence of Motivation, Work Environment, Competence, and Compensation on Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance in the Bali Provincial Public Works Office. Journal of Management, Business Strategy, and Entrepreneurship. 6(2): p: 173-184.
Edy, Sutrisno, 2016, Human Resource Management, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Ghozali, Imam. 2018. Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS Program
Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
Hamali, AY 2018. Understanding Human Resources. Yogyakarta: PT Buku Seru.
Hasibuan, Malay. 2002. Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Publisher.
Indrasari, Meithiana. 2017. Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance Review of Organizational Climate Dimensions, Individual Creativity, and Job Characteristics. Original Edition. Sidoarjo: Indomedia Pustaka.
Kadarisman, M. 2012. Human Resource Development Management.
Jakarta: PT.
Manullang, M and Pakpahan, M.2014. Research Methodology. Practical Research Process. Bandung: Citapustaka Media.
Murty Aprilia Windy and Gunasti Hudiwinarsih. 2012. The Effect of Compensation, Motivation and Organizational Commitment on the Performance of Accounting Employees (Empirical Study on Manufacturing Companies in Surabaya). Indonesian Accounting Review Journal, Vol. 2 No.2.pp. 215-228.
Nuraini, T. 2013. Human Resource Management, Aini Syam Foundation: Pekanbaru.
Pabundu Tika.2010. Organizational Culture and Company Performance Improvement, 3rd edition. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Rahmawati, Nela Pima. et al. 2014. The Influence of Work Environment on Employee Performance (Study on Employees of the North Malang Pratama Tax Service Office). Journal of Business Administration (JAB) Vol. 8 No. 2.
Ratnawati. 2012. Analysis of the Influence of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment in Improving Employee Performance. Journal of Business and Economics. 19(2):h:170-187.
Rivai, Veithzal and Ella Djauhari Sagala.2013, Human Resource Management for Companies, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Sedarmayanti. 2010. Human Resource Management. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono. 2015. Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sule, ET, & Priansa., DJ 2018. Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Building Superior Organizations in the Era of Change). Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Supadmi and Nimran, 2014. The Influence of Training, Compensation on Employee Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance. Journal of Economics and Business. 2(3): p:25-33
Umi Wita Zahriyah. 2015. The Influence of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance (Study on Employees of PT. PLN (Persero) East Java Distribution, Malang Area). Journal of Business Administration. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pages 1-7.
Widyono, 2013. The Influence of Compensation on Employee Job Satisfaction (Case Study on Elementary School Teachers in Campurdarat District, Tulung Agung Regency). Journal of Management. 1(2): p: 1-17
