PENGATURAN DAN EFEKTIVITAS SANKSI PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM HUKUM POSITIF SERTA REFORMULASINYA  DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMBAHARUAN  HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA

Imam Fathwa; Siti Humulhaer; Bayu Triwibowo; Tri Susanto; Ratu Chumairoh Noor

doi:10.47353/bj.v5i12.63

Authors

Imam Fathwa Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Siti Humulhaer Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Bayu Triwibowo Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Tri Susanto Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang
Ratu Chumairoh Noor Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf Tangerang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v5i12.63

Keywords:

corruption crime, criminal sanctions, positive law, sentencing policy, criminal law reform

Abstract

Corruption is one of the crimes that has serious impacts on the life of the nation and the state, as it causes state financial losses and hampers national development. Therefore, Indonesian positive law strictly regulates criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption through Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. This study aims to analyze the regulation of criminal sanctions for corruption in Indonesian positive law, evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation in judicial practice, and examine the reformulation of sentencing policies from the perspective of criminal law reform. The research method used in this study is normative legal research employing statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of criminal sanctions for corruption in Indonesian positive law includes principal penalties in the form of imprisonment and fines, as well as additional penalties such as payment of compensation for state losses, asset confiscation, and revocation of certain rights. However, in practice, the implementation of these sanctions still faces several obstacles, including sentencing disparities and the suboptimal recovery of state financial losses. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate criminal sanction policies for corruption through strengthening asset recovery mechanisms and establishing sentencing guidelines in order to realize a criminal justice system that is more effective, fair, and capable of creating a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Buku

Arief, B.N. (2005). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Effendy, M. (2012). Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Tinjauan terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Referensi.

Hamzah, A. (2010). Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marzuki, P.M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mulyadi, L. (2012). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Khusus terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi, dan Putusan Peradilan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

B. Jurnal dan Artikel Ilmiah

Budiardjo, M.R., & Pratiwi, D.A. (2022). Efektivitas Penerapan Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(1), 45–68.

Humulhaer, S., & Pratama, R. Implementasi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum, 17(1), 26.

Humulhaer, S. (2023). THE HARMONIZATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE ERADICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum.

Nursyam, I. (2021). Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Tinjauan terhadap Prinsip Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 112–135.

Purwanti, A., & Syahroni, N. (2023). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Instrumen Pemulihan Kerugian Negara. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 10(1), 78–99.

Widjojanto, B. (2020). Korupsi, Kekuasaan, dan Keadilan: Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Peradilan Tipikor Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 2(1), 1–29.

C. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

D. Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Jakarta Nomor 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1456 K/Pid.Sus/2023.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2103 K/Pid.Sus/2021.

E. Sumber Internet

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Statistik Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diakses dari https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik pada tanggal 10 Januari 2025.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Direktori Putusan. Diakses dari https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id pada tanggal 15 Januari 2025.

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Diakses dari https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 pada tanggal 12 Januari 2025.