KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP FENOMENA AI VOICE CLONING DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v6i2.485Keywords:
AI Voice Cloning, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Law, Privacy Protection, Intellectual Property Rights, Deepfake Audio, AI RegulationAbstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has produced significant innovations, including AI Voice Cloning which enables replication of human voice with very high accuracy. Although this phenomenon has potential positive applications in various sectors, it also poses serious risks related to fraud, identity falsification, privacy violations, and intellectual property rights infringement. In Indonesia, specific regulations regarding AI Voice Cloning are not yet available, so handling this phenomenon relies on interpretation from various existing legal instruments. This study analyzes the relevant legal framework, jurisdictional challenges, and socio-economic implications of AI Voice Cloning using normative legal research methods and interdisciplinary approaches. The results show that Indonesian legal policy requires comprehensive development covering technical regulations, protection of voice rights as intellectual property objects, digital verification mechanisms, and harmonization with international standards. This study recommends the formation of specific regulations, strengthening law enforcement capacity, and developing an AI ethics ecosystem involving multi-stakeholders.
Downloads
References
Buku
Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.
Murray, A. D. (2016). Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press.
Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
Jurnal Ilmiah
Brennen, J. S., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). What to Do about Digital Disinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security. California Law Review, 107, 1753-1819.
Citron, D. K., & Franks, M. A. (2020). The Internet as a Speech Machine and Other Myths Confounding Section 230 Reform. UC Davis Law Review, 55, 2229-2262.
Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2018). Slave to the Algorithm? Why a Right to an Explanation is Probably Not the Remedy You are Looking For. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16, 18-84.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI inSociety. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
Harris, Z. S. (2020). Deepfakes: False Pornography is Here and the Law Cannot Protect You. Duke Law & Technology Review, 17, 237-265.
Kietzmann, J., & Dabirian, A. (2020). Deepfakes: On the Ethics of Synthetic Media. Journal of Business Ethics.
Klonick, K. (2018). The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598-1670.
Laidlaw, E. B. (2015). Regulating Speech in Cyberspace: Gatekeepers, Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Mantelero, A. (2018). AI and Big Data: A Blueprint for a Human Rights, Social and Ethical Impact Assessment. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 754-772.
Mittelstadt, B. D. (2019). Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507.
Ohm, P. (2010). Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701-1777.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, P. M. (2019). Global Data Privacy: The EU Way. New York University Law Review, 94(4), 771-818.
Tusikov, N. (2016). Chokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet. University of California Press.
Veale, M., Binns, R., & Edwards, L. (2018). Algorithms That Remember: Algorithmic Harm and Data Protection Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2133), 20180083.
Zarsky, T. Z. (2016). The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making. Philosophy & Technology, 29(4), 409-433.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.
Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Elektronik dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.
Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
California. (2019). Assembly Bill No. 730 (AB 730) - Elections: deceptive audio or visual media.
China. (2023). Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services. Cyberspace Administration of China.
European Parliament and Council. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1-88.
European Parliament and Council. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 277, 1-102.
European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689, 1-144.
Texas. (2019). House Bill No. 632 (HB 632) - Relating to the creation of a deepfake video to influence the outcome of an election.
United States. (2019). Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019 (DEEPFAKES Accountability Act). H.R. 3230, 116th Congress.
Laporan dan Dokumen Organisasi
Badan Siber dan Sandi Negara (BSSN). (2024). Laporan Tahunan Keamanan Siber Indonesia 2023. BSSN.
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). COM/2021/206 final.
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission.
IEEE. (2019). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. IEEE.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital. (2024). Laporan Kinerja Penanganan Konten Negatif 2023. Kemenkomdigi.
OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). Statistik Perkembangan Fintech 2023. OJK.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO.
United Nations. (2023). Global Digital Compact. UN Doc. A/RES/77/195.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2024. WEF.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property and Frontier Technologies. WIPO.
Sumber Elektronik dan Database
ElevenLabs. (2024). Voice AI Technology. Retrieved from https://elevenlabs.io/
European Commission. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
IEEE Standards Association. (2024). AI Standards. Retrieved from https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/autonomous-systems.html
Partnership on AI. (2024). Tenets. Retrieved from https://www.partnershiponai.org/
Resemble AI. (2024). Voice Cloning Technology. Retrieved from https://www.resemble.ai/
United Nations. (2023). Global Digital Compact. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/techenvoy/global-digital-compact
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dadang Rachmat, Mustofa Kamil, Ervawati, Dede Agus Sodikin, Djamal Efendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
