SAFEGUARD MEASURES SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PERLINDUNGAN INDUSTRI NASIONAL DI ERA LIBERALISASI PERDAGANGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v4i4.372Keywords:
Safeguard Measures, National Industry Protection, Trade Liberalization, WTO, Agreement on SafeguardsAbstract
International trade liberalization mandated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) requires its members to open domestic markets for goods and services from other countries. However, uncontrolled liberalization may negatively impact domestic industries, particularly when unforeseen import surges occur. In this context, safeguard measures become a crucial instrument enabling WTO member states to protect their national industries temporarily from the adverse effects of import surges. This study aims to analyze the legal framework of safeguard measures within the WTO system, their implementation in Indonesian national law, and their effectiveness as an instrument for protecting national industries in the era of trade liberalization. The research method employed is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results indicate that although Indonesia has regulated safeguard measures in Government Regulation Number 34 of 2011, there are substantial weaknesses, including the absence of comprehensive specific regulations, limited outreach to industrial actors, and inconsistencies of several provisions with the WTO Agreement on Safeguards. This study recommends the establishment of a specific Trade Remedies Law that systematically integrates safeguard, anti-dumping, and countervailing measures to provide optimal legal protection for Indonesian national industries.
Downloads
References
Buku
Ahn, Dukgeun. (2006). Safeguard System in the WTO: The Experience of Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Barutu, Christoporus. (2007). Ketentuan Anti Dumping, Subsidi dan Tindakan Pengamanan (Safeguard) dalam GATT dan WTO. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Bhala, Raj. (2001). International Trade Law: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). New York: LexisNexis.
Croley, Steven P., & Jackson, John H. (1996). "WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments." Journal of International Economic Law, 3(1), 49-80.
Islam, Rahmat. (1999). International Trade Law. Sydney: LBC Information Services.
Juwana, Hikmahanto. (2010). Hukum Internasional dalam Perspektif Indonesia sebagai Negara Berkembang. Makassar: Yasrif Watampone.
Lubis, A. U., et al. (2010). Analisis Kepentingan Indonesia terhadap Special Safeguard Mechanism dalam Perundingan Pertanian WTO. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pertanian.
Suhardi, & Gunarto. (2007). Politik Perdagangan Internasional Modern. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Syahmin, A. K. (2006). Hukum Dagang Internasional (dalam Kerangka Studi Analitis). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tambunan, Tulus T. H. (2004). Globalisasi dan Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Todaro, Michael P. (1994). Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga (Ed. ke-4, Jilid 2). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Jurnal Ilmiah
Intraswari, D., & Sudiarta, I. M. (2015). "Perlindungan Industri Dalam Negeri melalui Tindakan Safeguard WTO." Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 12(2), 145-162.
Kusumaningrum, Adi. (2018). "Pengaturan Safeguards Sektor Angkutan Udara ASEAN di Era Liberalisasi Jasa." Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen dan Hukum, 1(1), 1-20. https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/download/75/30/
Lestari, D. (2010). "Harmonisasi Regulasi dan Efektivitas Institusi Safeguard di Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 28(3), 215-234.
Nogués, Julio J., & Baracat, Elias. (2005). "Political Economy of Antidumping and Safeguards in Argentina." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3614.Washington,DC:WorldBank.https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/571471468002637295/pdf/wps3614.pdf
Pauwelyn, Joost. (2003). "The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements." Journal of International Economic Law, 6(1), 109-142.
Utami, Mira, & Aris, Umar. (2022). "Implementasi Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan dalam Tindakan Pengamanan Perdagangan (Safeguard) untuk Melindungi Industri Dalam Negeri." IBLAM Law Review, 6(1), 79-92. https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/index.php/ILR/article/download/534/441/2560
Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Perjanjian Internasional
Agreement on Safeguards. (1994). Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A. Geneva: WTO.
ASEAN. (2009). ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement (ACIA)*. Cha-am: ASEAN Secretariat.
Indonesia. (1994). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1994 Nomor 58.
Indonesia. (1995). Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1995 tentang Kepabeanan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1995 Nomor 75.
Indonesia. (2006). Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1995 tentang Kepabeanan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2006 Nomor 93.
Indonesia. (2011). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 34 Tahun 2011 tentang Tindakan Anti Dumping, Tindakan Imbalan, dan Tindakan Pengamanan Perdagangan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2011 Nomor 74.
Indonesia. (2003). Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Nomor 84/MPP/Kep/2/2003 tentang Pembentukan Komite Pengamanan Perdagangan Indonesia (KPPI).
Indonesia. (2003). Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Nomor 85/MPP/Kep/2003 tentang Prosedur dan Persyaratan Permohonan Penyelidikan Pengamanan Industri Dalam Negeri dari Dampak Lonjakan Impor.
Timor-Leste. (2023). Decree-Law on Trade Remedies Measures (Approved by the Council of Ministers on 6th December 2023). Dili: Council of Ministers. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/tls_e/wtacctls32_leg_9.pdf
Dokumen WTO dan Sumber Resmi Lainnya
Appellate Body Report. (1999). Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear (WT/DS121/AB/R). Geneva: WTO.
Appellate Body Report. (2000). Korea –Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products (WT/DS98/AB/R). Geneva: WTO.
Appellate Body Report. (2001). United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Wheat Gluten from the European Communities (WT/DS166/AB/R). Geneva: WTO.
Appellate Body Report. (2002). United States – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Line Pipe from Korea (WT/DS202/AB/R). Geneva: WTO.
CARICOM Secretariat. (2008). Safeguards in Agreements to Liberalize Trade in Services. Georgetown: CARICOM. https://caricom.org/documents/9812-safeguards.pdf
European Communities. (1999). Request for Consultations: Argentina – Measures Affecting Imports of Footwear, Textiles, Apparel and Other Items (WT/DS56). Geneva: WTO.
Jean Monnet Program. (2016). Unit XV: Safeguard Measures. New York: NYU School of Law. https://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/WTO-Unit-15-Safeguards-2016-editon.pdf
WTO. (1995). The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
WTO. (2018). Annual Report 2018. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
WTO. (2023). Technical Information on Safeguard Measures. Geneva: WTO CouncilforTradeinGoods.https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/safeg_e/safeg_info_e.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Subhan, Zainura

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




